laser_model_type should not be namespaced
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 82/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- yaml
- Domain
- robotics
Research direction
Start with otto600Params.yaml and otto1500Params.yaml, then search the repository for every YAML definition of laser_model_type. Check each value for the robot namespace and correct the affected configuration entries. Done means all YAML files define laser_model_type without a namespace.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Currently, the 'otto600Params.yaml' and 'otto1500Params.yaml' files contain the following parameters:
laser_model_type': "<robot_namespace>/likelihood_field"
laser_model_type should not be namespaced, and this error should be corrected in all YAML files that define this field.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 98
- Forks
- 22
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from RobotecAI/ROSCon2023Demo
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
RobotecAI/ROSCon2023Demo#302 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
RobotecAI/ROSCon2023Demo#296 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
RobotecAI/ROSCon2023Demo#287 · 1 comment ·
All issues in RobotecAI/ROSCon2023Demo
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
AXERA-TECH/ax-llm#77 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
games-on-whales/wolf#509 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
bug-unconfirmed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
NVIDIA/cuda-samples#453 ·