test(content-node): compose-based integration test for the Kubo client
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 58/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- docker-compose, python
- Domain
- distributed-systems, testing
Research direction
Start by reading the content node and Kubo client code, then inspect the compose configuration and CI workflows; the issue does not name specific files. Once dependency #61 is complete, run the kubo service, add content through the Python client, and read it back through the gateway. Done means a CI job runs on relevant pull requests and fails when the returned CIDs differ.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
A CI job that proves the client and node work together, so version bumps are caught.
Estimated size: S
Proposal
- Start the compose
kuboservice in CI, add content through the Python client, read it back through the gateway, and compare CIDs.
Acceptance criteria
- The job runs on PRs that touch the content node or client and fails on mismatch.
Dependencies
- #61
Part of #43. Ground rules for the content layer: no secrets in the repo, content-layer failures must never block or discard quantum execution, and tests and docs ship with every PR.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 4
- Avg merge
- 5h 19m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 11
Getting set up
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- No contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from QMeshPy/distributed-quantum
-
enhancement good first issue helia storage tier-1
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#53 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
chain-integration enhancement payments research-spike tier-2
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#78 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
chain-integration enhancement payments research-spike tier-2
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 66/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#77 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
chain-integration enhancement payments tier-2
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#76 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
documentation good first issue kubo storage tier-1
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 42/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#75 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in QMeshPy/distributed-quantum
Similar issues
-
good first issue priority: low size: XS testing
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
cubrid-lab/cubrid-mcp-server#385 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
good first issue priority: low size: S testing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
cubrid-lab/cubrid-cookbook-python#447 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Python PointcloudOpen
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
ArduCAM/Arducam_tof_camera#125 ·
-
area:curator enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
CassioDalla/Scrinalia#150 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
documentation good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100