Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Failed to reproduce mova-360p’s LSE-C and LSE-D metrics on Verse-Bench

Open
#40 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Quiet
Tech stack
huggingface, python

Research direction

Start with the Verse-Bench Hugging Face dataset, GitHub repository, and the office code demo settings used for video inference. Compare the preparation, inference, and LSE-C/LSE-D evaluation steps against the reported paper results and the uploaded set3 cases; done means identifying the source of the discrepancy or explaining why the reported metrics cannot be reproduced.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Hi,

I tried to reproduce mova-360p’s LSE-C and LSE-D metrics on Verse-Bench, but ran into some issues. I followed the instructions in Verse-Bench (Hugging Face dataset) and Verse-Bench (GitHub repo) to prepare the test data and run the evaluation. For video inference, I used the same settings as the office code demo.

However, my average LSE-C is 5.41 and the average LSE-D is 13.303, which are much worse than the numbers reported in the paper. When I visualized the generated videos, they didn’t look obviously strange.

I uploaded the first two inference results from set3 here:
Google Drive link

In my tests:

  • For case0: LSE-C = 4.4768114, LSE-D = 12.80221240751205
  • For case-1: LSE-C = 6.9611187, LSE-D = 13.244998070501513

I’m not sure what might be causing this discrepancy.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
1.1k
Forks
97
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Getting set up

This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from OpenMOSS/MOVA

All issues in OpenMOSS/MOVA

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.