What's the recommended way to wait a list of senders?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
Start by reviewing the issue's vector-of-senders example and the constraints of the mentioned when_all facility. Determine whether the project already has an entry point for dynamically sized sender collections and what parallel execution and result collection should mean. Done should be a documented, agreed recommendation or a clearly scoped change request.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
e.g. I have a vector of senders.
int n = <some runtime-known number>;
std::vector<MySender> senders;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
senders.push_back(...);
}
How to execute them in parallel and get all results? when_all doesn't work because all input senders of when_all should be known at compile-time. I can't pass a vector to when_all.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 2.4k
- Forks
- 270
- Avg merge
- 2d 16h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 43
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from NVIDIA/stdexec
-
inline_scheduler's namespace-scope static_assert fails under nvcc (private nested __sender access) Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 65/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
duckdb/duckdb-wasm#2258 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
objectionary/eo-graphs#75 ·
-
Coarray integration tests carry no LABELS, so run_tests.py silently skips them under every backend Opencoarray
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
FISCO-BCOS/FISCO-BCOS#5642 ·