Checkpoint loading can mix model weights and training state from different epochs
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- machine-learning
Research direction
Start at the load_checkpoint and save_checkpoint entry points and run the minimal reproduction to observe the mismatched epoch, model weight, and optimizer state. Ensure loading chooses one checkpoint index for all requested models and training state, fails before mutation when a required file is missing, and preserves model-only directory behavior; verify the single-process and distributed cases described in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Version and installation
Source checkout: main at 94dbdf829d1a4e93e3f31ecb77713392c471388e. Also reproduced in the original #2010 implementation at 01757c816713892c38455d489376494ee7ee11e5. Python 3.13.8, PyTorch 2.12.0+cu130, Linux.
Description
load_checkpoint(..., epoch=None) independently selects the latest surviving file for the training state and for each requested model. If the newest model weights are deleted but an older weights file remains, loading succeeds with old model weights and newer optimizer/scheduler state. It reports the newer epoch, so training silently resumes from an inconsistent combination of states.
The same mismatch can occur in the other direction: a newer model file with no matching training-state file is combined with older training state.
Minimal reproduction
from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory
import torch
from physicsnemo.utils import load_checkpoint, save_checkpoint
with TemporaryDirectory() as directory:
path = Path(directory)
model = torch.nn.Linear(1, 1, bias=False)
optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=0.01)
for epoch in (1, 2):
with torch.no_grad():
model.weight.fill_(epoch)
optimizer.param_groups[0]["lr"] = epoch * 0.01
save_checkpoint(path, models=model, optimizer=optimizer, epoch=epoch)
(path / "Linear.0.2.pt").unlink()
fresh = torch.nn.Linear(1, 1, bias=False)
fresh_optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(fresh.parameters(), lr=0.5)
epoch = load_checkpoint(path, models=fresh, optimizer=fresh_optimizer)
print(epoch, fresh.weight.item(), fresh_optimizer.param_groups[0]["lr"])
Observed output:
2 1.0 0.02
The returned epoch and optimizer learning rate come from epoch 2; the model weight comes from epoch 1. No exception is raised.
Expected behavior
Select one training checkpoint index and require every requested model's weights at that same index. If any required file is missing, fail clearly before changing model or training state. The caller can explicitly select an older complete checkpoint. Do not independently fall back to older or newer model files.
This should also work for automatically numbered saves, where the filename index may exist without an epoch key in the training-state payload. Preserve current behavior for directories containing only model weights.
Scope and verification
Reproduced with single-process loading and on both ranks of a two-process CPU/Gloo DTensor run, including optimizer and scheduler restoration. The filename selection is independent of the device backend. The issue exists on main and was identified while reviewing #2010; that PR will address it.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 3.3k
- Forks
- 787
- Avg merge
- 2d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 24
Getting set up
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from NVIDIA/physicsnemo
-
? - Needs Triage bug
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
NVIDIA/physicsnemo#2021 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
? - Needs Triage bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
NVIDIA/physicsnemo#2020 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
NVIDIA/physicsnemo#2024 · 2 comments · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
🐛[BUG]: power_spectrum in metrics.general puts the zero frequency half a cell off along an odd widthOpen
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
NVIDIA/physicsnemo#2007 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100
NVIDIA/physicsnemo#2005 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in NVIDIA/physicsnemo
Similar issues
-
customer-reported
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Azure/azure-cli#34150 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
community-request
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
NVIDIA-NeMo/Curator#2464 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
WeblateOrg/translation-finder#1099 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
trezor/trezor-firmware#7997 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day