Peer reputation: adopt v1's compact inline format on invoice/detail screens
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 74/100
Research direction
Start by locating PeerReputationCard and the pay-invoice, add-invoice, and trade-detail screens named in the issue; compare the existing order-book reputation row and its reputationTradesLabel/reputationDaysLabel keys. Replace the card layout on those screens with the compact inline presentation, retaining the title and existing labels; leave take_order_screen unchanged. Done when those three screens use the compact row and the maker card remains as-is.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Follow-up to #305, which surfaced the taker reputation using the 3-column card shared with the maker's take-order card. That's functional but bulky on the space-constrained pay/add-invoice screens (competes with the QR / input).
v1 shows it as a single compact line — `★ 4.4 · 4 trades · 64 days` — which matches v2's own order-book reputation row (`reputationTradesLabel`/`reputationDaysLabel`).
Proposal
Replace `PeerReputationCard`'s 3-column layout with a compact inline row on the pay-invoice, add-invoice and trade-detail screens.
Reuse the order-book plural label keys (no new stat labels); keep the "Buyer/Seller reputation" title.
Keep the maker's 3-column card in `take_order_screen` as-is (it has the space).
Optional: show `/ 5` after the rating, as v1 does.
- Dominant language
- Dart
- Stars
- 11
- Forks
- 9
- Avg merge
- 13h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 259
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from MostroP2P/app
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Add-invoice screen stays on "Sent, waiting for the node" after a late acceptance on a sell orderOpenbug priority: medium
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area: ui
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
MostroP2P/app#341 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
bggRGjQaUbCoE/PiliPlus#3235 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
intel/rohd-wave-viewer#11 ·
-
DOCS UPDATE: README.md and BACKEND.md reference a search-meetings edge function that does not existOpendocumentation
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 93/100
AOSSIE-Org/Ell-ena#337 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 66/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
cat: puzzle
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
lichess-org/mobile#3826 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days