DOI representation in cell cards needs to be more understandable and consistent
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- frontend
Research direction
Start by locating the Detail Card, grid-view filter sidebar, and Source Publication widget mentioned in the issue, then compare how each currently formats DOI and publication information. Implement the agreed interim formatting consistently across those views; done means the DOI is recognizable, journal names are omitted where requested, and "et al.," punctuation matches.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
DOI is not really a human readable thing. I don't memorize DOIs, convention is (first author, year) or (first author et al., year)
In Detail Cards, the DOI isn't the full doi, which makes it hard to even recognize that it's a DOI. (green box, image 1). it's missing the journal's identifier in the part of the URI (e.g., it's not sciadv.adj9173, it's 10.1126/sciadv.adj9173.
In the filter sidebar of the grid view, , it would be best to have the same formatting.
In the Source Publication widget of the Cell Card, It's not clear how this information is retrieved. Do not display the journal name. Also, ensure that formatting for "et al.," is "et al.," not "et al" see purple box, image 2.
In our lab meeting, we discussed 2 fixes (interim and full):
Interim fix:.
change what is displayed on the detail card, and grid view filter side panel to match what is displayed in the "other cells from this source" widget. [see picture 2, orange box)
Full fix: Tom will implement the lookup for DOIs within Interlex. {to be more fully described by him}
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 3
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from MetaCell/interlex
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
All issues in MetaCell/interlex
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
HarperFast/skills#96 ·
-
[Block] Latest Posts [Type] Bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Automattic/studio#4908 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
sugarlabs/musicblocks#8847 ·