Consider unifying this repo with upstream
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- shell
- Domain
- build-system
Research direction
Review the repository's migration to cibuildwheel and compare its maintenance needs with the upstream statsmodels project. The work is complete when maintainers have decided whether to unify the repositories and documented the rationale or next steps.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Since the migration to cibuildwheel, it would seem this repo could be merged with the upstream statsmodels. That would get more eyes on the wheel building, and would make it easier to manage things like the API secret by the project maintainers. Is there a reason to keep it separate here?
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 12
- Avg merge
- 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Similar issues
-
Update to NCCL 2.32 Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
conda-forge/nccl-feedstock#166 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
pop-os/plymouth-theme#43 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
hykilpikonna/hyfetch#545 ·
-
on hold T: core-bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100