Add dct and r2r
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reading the existing fft support in AbstractFFTs.jl and determine the expected API and behavior for dct and r2r; done means both transforms are supported consistently with fft and covered by appropriate tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
It's not clear why fft is here but not dct or r2r.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 135
- Forks
- 40
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl#159 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl#147 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl#135 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 28/100
JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl#125 · 2 reactions ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl#122 · 3 comments ·
All issues in JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl
Similar issues
-
TSDAE's docstring implies a theta argument it does not takePossibly taken @singhharsh1708 claimed this today. Opendocumentation
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 74/100
SciML/PETScDiffEq.jl#282 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement good first issue help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
SavedSubsystem with an integer save_idxs maps the index the wrong way roundPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
SciML/SciMLBase.jl#1643 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
authority-vechtstromen ready-for-agent
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 75/100
Deltares/Ribasim-NL#890 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day