An ordered comparison on a JSON number is unknown: make the rule prominent for pack authors
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 69/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Read the operator section and authoring guide, then check the conformance vectors for an existing case covering ordered comparison with a JSON number. Add the rule and the input-side fix where authors encounter them, and add a vector if none covers it; done when the guidance explains why the condition becomes unknown and how to avoid it.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Observed. Ordered comparison is defined on decimal strings. A fact given as a JSON number makes the condition unknown, which escalates. Unless the runtime's comparable-facts switch is on, nothing reports why.
Ask. State the rule where authors meet it (the operator section and the authoring guide), with the one-line fix on the input side, and consider a conformance vector that pins it if none does.
Found in an end-to-end trial of the released binaries (spec 0.3.0). Found by writing packs and matrices against the published schema.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 6
- Avg merge
- 4h 57m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 95
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec
-
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#293 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
dialect §2: drop the adapter-http query exception once Runner v0.28.0 holds query to §4.1May be free again A pull request for this issue was closed without being merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#282 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Cover a rule's or an exception's reference list written without its array, or with a repeated entryOpengood first issue
Difficulty 2/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 76/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#158 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement priority:top
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#298 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement priority:top
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#297 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT#16733 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
changelog investigate
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 74/100
ramnes/notion-sdk-py#444 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
QuantConnect/Documentation#2858 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
btclib-org/btclib#3047 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
kubescape/helm-charts#1013 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day