RFC 0002: define a reusable subgraph contract before adding nested graph nodes
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start from the existing JPS pack semantics (outcome-as-fact and evidence-availability edges) and the graph workspace release this follows. Draft RFC 0002 as a document that stays in Draft status and covers each listed topic: inputs/outputs, reference resolution, identity/version binding, limits, ordering, traces, review/lock boundaries and compatibility. Done means documented decisions, open questions and testable examples that scope a separate experimental runtime.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
The current runtime composes pack nodes with outcome-as-fact and evidence-availability edges. It does not nest graphs. Develop a draft proposal for reusable subgraphs without silently treating copies as live references.
Address explicit inputs/outputs, project reference resolution, identity/version binding, expanded node namespaces, recursion/cycle and size limits, deterministic ordering, unresolved dispositions and handoffs, result traces, review/lock boundaries, compatibility and examples.
Keep RFC 0002 Draft; this work does not declare a normative specification or change existing JPS pack semantics. Explicit import/expansion into a flat graph remains distinguishable from a live reusable subgraph.
Acceptance: documented decisions, unresolved questions and testable examples sufficient to scope a separate experimental runtime implementation. Follow-up to the graph workspace release; not a dependency for combining the browser or enabling chat rehearsal.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 6
- Avg merge
- 6h 15m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 69
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec
-
Difficulty 2/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#200 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Cover a rule's or an exception's reference list written without its array, or with a repeated entryOpengood first issue
Difficulty 2/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 76/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#158 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
RFC 0018: define portable page bindings for multiple discovered endpointsPossibly taken @kikashy claimed this today. Open
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#199 · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 22/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#174 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 8/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#172 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec
Similar issues
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Graphify-Labs/graphify#4524 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
topoteretes/cognee#5982 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Patches of derivations with `__structuredAttrs` are ignoredPossibly taken @KiaraGrouwstra claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 81/100
nix-community/vulnix#184 ·
-
New InternshipOpennew_internship
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 64/100
aws-samples/sample-per-model-bedrock#295 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day