[FEATURE] - query the node for the max protocol version supported.
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
@newhoggy is already working on this.
Since Mar 26, 2025.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.
Description
What
As an SPO or DREP or CC, after updating my node to the version that supports a specific hardfork, I want to query the node for the maximum protocol version it supports before casting my vote, so that I can confirm it supports the protocol version required by the hardfork.
Why
What if it doesn't? 😱 How do I know?
Acceptance Criteria
When I send a query to the node requesting the maximum protocol version it supports,
then:
- The node returns the maximum protocol version it currently supports
- The response should be received within a reasonable timeframe.
- The response is clear about Major and Minor components of the protocol version.
Personas
- [x ] SPOs
- DReps
- CC members
- dApp Devs
- Exchanges
- Wallets
- 3rd party tools
- ADA holders
Definition of Done (DoD)
- Acceptance Criteria + User Stories & DoD created and singed-off (by PO, dev & test owners)
- Builds successfully on CI
- Code & Test review (as per Acceptance Criteria)
- There is documentation and/or examples for the new functionality (usage/response)
- Log/record changes on Vnext (or similar depending on what we adopt)
- Ticket number(s) included in PR description
- All Acceptance Criteria met and covered by dev/unit/property/integration tests
- System/E2E automated tests + System Test Engineer Owner Sign-off
NOTE: Ideally, we should merge only fully implemented and tested features into the master branch.
So all the above steps are required for the PR to be merged.
In order to avoid the PRs becoming stale and requiring to be rebased on master, these can be merged
after a reasonable time (current agreement is 3 days) if the System Test Engineer Owner's sign-off
was not provided (last step in the DoD).
IMPORTANT: Any deviation from the plan should be discussed and agreed as a comment in the Feature file.
Sign-off
- Product Owner
- Dev Owner
- System Test Engineer Owner
Related PRs
- PR # here
- Dominant language
- Haskell
- Stars
- 72
- Forks
- 24
- Avg merge
- 1d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from IntersectMBO/cardano-cli
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
IntersectMBO/cardano-cli#1306 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Ensure Plutus V4 scripts can be deserialised by cardano-cliPossibly taken @carbolymer claimed this 7 days ago. Open
IntersectMBO/cardano-cli#1448 · 1 comment · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Upstream non-Leios commits from the Leios integration branch to masterMay be free again @palas claimed this 49 days ago, and no pull request is open. Openrefactor
IntersectMBO/cardano-cli#1414 · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Add `transaction validate` command (online phase 1 + phase 2)May be free again @palas claimed this 135 days ago, and no pull request is open. Openenhancement epic
IntersectMBO/cardano-cli#1380 · 4 comments · 1 reaction · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Investigate incorporating cquisitor-style local tx validation (phase 1 + phase 2) into cardano-cliMay be free again @palas claimed this 156 days ago, and no pull request is open. OpenStale
IntersectMBO/cardano-cli#1367 · 6 comments · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in IntersectMBO/cardano-cli
Similar issues
-
bug good-title pdd
Difficulty 2/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 82/100
objectionary/phino#1630 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
attention: pr-welcome documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
haskell/cabal#12402 · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day