Verify evals on Papers with Code

Open Beginner friendly
#13 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Newbie friendliness
62/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Active
Domain
machine-learning

Research direction

Start with the linked paper and its Papers with Code page, then compare the eight listed evaluations with the paper's reported results. Check each score, model name, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata; done means confirming them or reporting the specific corrections needed.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Hi,

Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!

I've made the paper and 8 paper-native evaluations available on Papers with Code.

The paper has results on Reasoning, World Knowledge, Classic Language Modeling, and 1 additional task page.

Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected?

You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.

Kind regards,

Niels

Dominant language
Python
Stars
225
Forks
12
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from IBM/ModuleFormer

All issues in IBM/ModuleFormer

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.