Document the use of lmod module family to avoid loading both a local + EESSI software stack
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 72/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start with the existing EESSI module-based initialization documentation and the suggested host-injections/configuring EESSI section to decide where the paragraph fits. Explain how local modulefiles can use family(...) and how EESSI_MODULE_FAMILY_NAME puts EESSI modules in that family; done when the guidance covers the 2025/2026 example and links to Lmod’s family documentation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
I don't have time to write these docs now, and we need to figure out where they fit (probably under 'configuring EESSI', here, but...
For site setting up EESSI and that also offer local modules which load local module environments, one can set a family in the local modulefile and configure EESSI to set the same family through EESSI_MODULE_FAMILY_NAME. The latter is listed in https://www.eessi.io/docs/using_eessi/setting_up_environment/#module-based-initialization , but we should have a small paragraph on how to use this.
Example: system has local modules to load versions of a local software stack. E.g. modules 2025 and 2026. A site can add the family(<some_family_name>) to it, to ensure that 2025 and 2026 cannot be loaded at the same time (see https://lmod.readthedocs.io/en/latest/050_lua_modulefiles.html search for 'family'). By configuring export EESSI_MODULE_FAMILY_NAME=<some_family_name> a site can make sure that the EESSI modules are considered to be part of the same family, and therefore they cannot be loaded at the same time.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 14
- Forks
- 54
- Avg merge
- 11h 2m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 41
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from EESSI/docs
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
add "talks" sectionOpen
Difficulty 2/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 62/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
ChatBedrockConverse changes the keys of JSON tool results to camelCase (`order_id` becomes `orderId`)Possibly taken @geyazheng claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
langchain-ai/langchain-aws#1469 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
b4b usability
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
fix(schedule): align list_tasks since cursor filter boundary from strict > to >=Possibly taken @bfs2021 claimed this today. Openagent-ready bug p2 schedule
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 83/100
allenporter/supernote#540 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
frazane/scoringrules#164 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
The docs build fails: ecc's live inventory dropped the ecc.ecc names btclib's pinned ecc usesPossibly taken @fametrano claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
btclib-org/btclib#2968 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day