Restore the bound-runner regression test in the full-suite baseline
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
The failing test test_bound_runner_holds_reviewed_inodes_and_preserves_aws_venv_argv0 is part of the DTC full-suite baseline at revision 35a023da73e9f61173f82e273eea8c001b11830c. Reproduce run 40108254447 job 120914357212 to capture a sanitized traceback. Investigate via the DTC workflow preserving security behavior; done means the test passes in the baseline.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Observed failure
The DTC full-suite baseline reports ERROR for:
test_bound_runner_holds_reviewed_inodes_and_preserves_aws_venv_argv0
This was observed at site revision
35a023da73e9f61173f82e273eea8c001b11830c during the package P16 comparison
in run 40108254447, DTC job 120914357212.
Both the site's pinned-package run and the changed-package run selected
4392 tests and reported this same error. The changed-package run also had
the two documented P16 local-link seal artifacts; its comparison verdict
found no new package failures. The green comparison does not establish a
green DTC baseline.
Diagnosis still needed
The sanitized comparison extraction retained test names and counts only.
The exception type, traceback, and underlying cause are not yet known.
This issue records a baseline defect for investigation, without attributing
it to the released Relay recipient-option change or assuming a timeout or
environment mismatch.
Duplicate check
Searches across open and closed issues for the exact test name, argv0,
and reviewed-inode/bound-runner terms found no exact tracker. Issue 319
names different synthetic runner and container smoke tests; it is not
confirmed to cover this error. Issue 199 concerns component execution
bounds and is closed.
Please obtain a bounded, sanitized traceback and investigate through the
DTC issue workflow while preserving the security behavior this regression
test protects.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Avg merge
- 32m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Getting set up
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- No contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from DataTalksClub/website
-
bug infra operations P1 testing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
DataTalksClub/website#329 ·
-
bug content data-migration documentation events operations P1
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
DataTalksClub/website#327 ·
-
bug frontend P0 testing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
DataTalksClub/website#300 · 7 comments ·
-
bug data-migration events P0 testing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
DataTalksClub/website#295 · 6 comments ·
-
foundation
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
DataTalksClub/website#482 ·
All issues in DataTalksClub/website
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
btclib-org/btclib#3062 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area:evals area:infra enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
jse-avl/support-bot#4 · 1 comment ·
-
bug good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
qte77/agentic-job-offer-to-application-kit#487 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
btclib-org/btclib-wallet#801 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
documentation good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 94/100