Ambiguity around the datadog-operator configuration with EKS addon
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- aws, helm, kubernetes
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Open the linked Operator EKS Add-on documentation page and compare its wording with the reported aws eks describe-addon-configuration output. Verify whether addon configuration overrides are supported, then clarify the documentation so the restriction and expected configuration behavior are unambiguous.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Documentation Page
https://docs.datadoghq.com/containers/guide/operator-eks-addon/
Issue Description
I recently tried to deploy a datadog-operator with AWS EKS addons.
Seeing the addon configuration schema, it says that the datadog operator EKS addon doesnt support configuration file. Here is the output of the aws eks describe-addon-configuration command:
{
"addonName": "datadog_operator",
"addonVersion": "v0.1.13-eksbuild.1",
"configurationSchema": "{\"$schema\":\"https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/schema\",\"additionalProperties\":false,\"description\":\"No configuration support for datadog_operator\",\"type\":\"object\"}",
"podIdentityConfiguration": []
}
But, based on the documentation here, it says something about the addon - "Operator Helm Chart values, which can be overridden, are restricted to a schema file.".
I understood from this sentence that the configuration for the addon could be overriden. Am I wrong? If so, can we improve the wording?
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 621
- Forks
- 1.3k
- Avg merge
- 2d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 441
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from DataDog/documentation
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
DataDog/documentation#39746 · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
DataDog/documentation#38651 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
DataDog/documentation#37078 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
DataDog/documentation#36762 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
DataDog/documentation#36300 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in DataDog/documentation
Similar issues
-
bug confirmed perf
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
videojs/video.js#9400 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agent/scanner bug hive/hosted-available-lke648397-260827-5n31
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
rescript-lang/rescript#8765 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
feedback simulation workshop
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4417 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Good First Issue]: Add unit tests for NetworkVersionInfoPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. OpenGood First Issue hacktoberfest
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
hiero-ledger/hiero-sdk-js#4489 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day