get_downtime API always returns None for monitors

Open

#2,262 opened on Nov 14, 2024 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty: 3/5
Estimated time: 1-2 days
Newbie friendliness: 35/100

Issue type: Bug
Clarity: Mostly clear
Activity status: Stale
Tech stack: python
Domain: api

Research direction

Reproduce the issue with DowntimesApi.get_downtime using include='monitor' and downtime_id from the report. Trace how the response is represented in datadog-api-client 2.29.0 and compare relationships.monitor.data with the expected impacted-monitor list. Done means the API response exposes the impacted monitors instead of None, with coverage for this case.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

kind/bug stale

Describe the bug
get_downtime API does not return the list Impacted Monitors. It always return None

        from datadog_api_client.v2.api.downtimes_api import DowntimesApi

        api_response = datadog_downtimes_api.get_downtime(
            downtime_id=downtime_id,
            include='monitor'
            # include='created_by,monitor'
        )
        print(api_response)

Actual
Response always has

'relationships': {'monitor': {'data': None}}, 'type': 'downtime'},

Expected
List of monitors impacted by the Downtime.

Using
datadog-api-client==2.29.0

Dominant language: Python
Stars: 166
Forks: 55
Avg merge: 2d 17h
Merged PRs (30d): 73

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Similar issues

[essnmx] Fix typo in NXLauetof application definition Open

essnmx good first issue

Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100

scipp/ess#760 · Opened Sep 23, 2026
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100

syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 · Opened Sep 23, 2026
garak adapter grades a NaN detector score as PASS Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100

Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · 1 comment · Opened Sep 23, 2026
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Open

area: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100

Nitjsefnie-Harness-Commons/daedalus#926 · Opened Sep 23, 2026
`IOCExtractor` always fails: `ioc_analyzer.build()` takes 1 argument but the agent dispatcher passes 2 Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100

yeti-platform/yeti#1380 · Opened Sep 23, 2026

More Python issues