Confirm ShapePipe bad-pixel handling in cutouts (ignore vs noise-fill)
@cailmdaley is already working on this.
Since Jul 16, 2026.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.
Description
Confirm whether ShapePipe ignores or noise-fills masked bad pixels within a postage-stamp cutout. Needed to judge whether running Maximask on individual exposures would be redundant. Action item: Cail / Martin.
Context: Paris meeting notes
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 18
- Forks
- 14
- Avg merge
- 8h 40m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from CosmoStat/shapepipe
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 78/100
All issues in CosmoStat/shapepipe
Similar issues
-
area: harness bug status: needs-triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Human-Agent-Society/reef#625 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 80/100
learningequality/kolibri#15351 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Name consistency Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
eellak/triplestore#65 · 1 comment ·