test: flaky integration tests when GetRandomMovie() returns a soft-deleted movie
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 78/100
Research direction
Start with GetRandomMovie() in the two named ServiceApplicationFactory.cs files and compare how each selects valid movies. Exclude soft-deleted entries in both implementations, then run the affected client and server integration tests; done means random selection cannot return a soft-deleted movie and those tests pass.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Describe the bug
Several integration tests are intermittently flaky because GetRandomMovie() can return a movie that an earlier test in the same class has already soft-deleted and never restored.
Observed failure, from PR #599 (Build and Test Library, run 42093778343). The change in that PR is unrelated, and the identical commit passed on a fork run:
CommunityToolkit.Datasync.Client.Test.Service.Integration_Tests.Read_SoftDeleted_NotDeleted_Returns200 [FAIL]
CommunityToolkit.Datasync.Client.DatasyncHttpException : Gone
at ServiceResponse.ThrowIfNotSuccessful(...)
at DatasyncServiceClient`1.GetAsync(String id, ...)
at Integration_Tests.Read_SoftDeleted_NotDeleted_Returns200() line 152
Root cause
- Each test class that uses the in-memory test server creates one
ServiceApplicationFactoryviaIClassFixture<ServiceApplicationFactory>. All tests in the class share one in-memory movie repository. GetRandomMovie()picks a random movie that satisfiesIsValid(...)(title, year and duration). It does not exclude movies whereDeleted == true.- Several tests soft-delete a random movie, either with
SoftDelete(existingMovie)or throughDELETE api/in-memory/softmovies/{id}. They never restore it. - If a later test in the same class randomly picks one of those movies and calls the
softmoviesendpoint, the server correctly returns410 Gone(or the test's other expectations break), and the test fails.
The failure rate is low and depends on test ordering. A few leaked soft-deleted rows sit in the set of seeded valid movies, so it is probably in the low single-digit percent range per run. That is why it only appears occasionally in CI.
I could not reproduce it locally. 15 consecutive runs of Service.Integration_Tests all passed.
Affected tests
Any test that calls GetRandomMovie() and expects a non-deleted movie, in a class that also soft-deletes movies. The soft-deleting tests also mutate Deleted state themselves.
tests/CommunityToolkit.Datasync.Client.Test
Service/Integration_Tests.cssoft-deletes inCreate_SoftDeleted_Returns409,Read_SoftDeleted_Deleted_Returns404,Read_SoftDeleted_Deleted_WithIncludeDeleted_Returns200,Delete_NotSoftDeleted_Returns204andDelete_SoftDeletedId_Returns410. All 16GetRandomMovie()call sites in that file are exposed.
tests/CommunityToolkit.Datasync.Server.Test has the same GetRandomMovie() implementation in Helpers/ServiceApplicationFactory.cs, and the same soft-delete pattern:
Service/Read_Tests.cs:Read_SoftDeleted_Deleted_Returns410andRead_SoftDeleted_Deleted_WithIncludeDeleted_Returns200.Read_SoftDeleted_NotDeleted_Returns200has the same signature as the observed failure.Service/Delete_Tests.cs:Delete_NotSoftDeleted_Returns204andDelete_SoftDeletedId_Returns410.Service/Replace_Tests.cs: three soft-delete tests.Service/Create_Tests.cs: one soft-delete test.
Suggested fix
Smallest fix: exclude soft-deleted movies in both GetRandomMovie() implementations:
repository.GetEntities().Where(x => IsValid(x) && !x.Deleted).ToList();
tests/CommunityToolkit.Datasync.Client.Test/Helpers/ServiceApplicationFactory.cstests/CommunityToolkit.Datasync.Server.Test/Helpers/ServiceApplicationFactory.cs
Tests that need a deleted movie already call SoftDelete(...) explicitly, so they are unaffected.
A more robust option is to also restore or reset the repository per test, as ResetInMemoryMovies() already does for the offline push tests. That removes the cross-test state sharing entirely, at some cost in test runtime.
Additional context
Delete_* tests that hard-delete a movie remove it from the repository, so they don't cause this problem. Only soft-deleted rows that stay in the repository do.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 184
- Forks
- 48
- Avg merge
- 21m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from CommunityToolkit/Datasync
-
Blocked dependencies Server
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
CommunityToolkit/Datasync#594 ·
-
dependencies Examples
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 40/100
CommunityToolkit/Datasync#593 ·
-
dependencies Infrastructure
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 72/100
CommunityToolkit/Datasync#592 ·
-
dependencies Infrastructure
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
CommunityToolkit/Datasync#591 ·
-
dependencies Infrastructure
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 55/100
CommunityToolkit/Datasync#590 ·
All issues in CommunityToolkit/Datasync
Similar issues
-
enhancement needs-triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
microsoft/microsoft-ui-reactor#1460 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
t/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
dotnet/maui#39950 · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
NimblePros/deviq-hugo#121 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
philterd/phileas-dotnet#188 ·
-
enhancement triaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
nikneem/sessionize-api-client#55 · 3 comments ·