muse spark 1.3 contributor usage bug
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 28/100
Research direction
Start by reviewing the attached session metadata and session transcript, then reproduce the reported usage with Command Code 1.46.0, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor, and the stated Windows cmd.exe environment. Compare cache accounting, token usage, and credit consumption with the expected behavior; done means identifying a reproducible product defect or documenting why the reported usage is expected.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
I've used muse spark 1.2 contributor and it it'd been the cheapest model to use at command-code, today was charged my go plan and
started to solve some bugs on a project with 1.3 contributor, only with 54.1m tokens I hit my limits, it means I spent 3 credits on only 54m
tokens. The last month I did 1.2b tokens with 10 credits, doing some numbers it means the performance on my go plan is 666% worst. I hope I
get a reset or part of my credits back.
Expected Behavior
with 300k of cache input I was supposed to get 1 billion tokens on muse spark with 3 credits, I only got 55m.
Actual Behavior
Most of the conversation wasn't cached.
Steps to reproduce the issue
Just coding with muse spark 1.3 contributor
Command Code Version
1.46.0
Operating System
Windows
Terminal/IDE
Unknown
Shell
cmd.exe
Session file (optional)
6a9ce306-af51-4823-b044-d6e85a1eabc7.meta.json
command-code-session-6a9ce306.md
I couldn't upload the session as jsonl.
Fix prompt (optional)
No response
Additional context
No response
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 4k
- Forks
- 350
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from CommandCodeAI/command-code
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#903 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#855 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#841 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#655 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#608 ·
All issues in CommandCodeAI/command-code
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
run-llama/llama_index#23199 ·
-
p:2-high pydanty:bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
pydantic/pydantic-ai#8642 · 2 comments ·
-
bug untriaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
opensearch-project/ml-commons#5094 ·
-
bug external groq
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
langchain-ai/langchain#40771 · 1 comment ·
-
ai-observability bug team/ai-observability
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100