License clarification: which license governs CodeEditLanguages?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- swift
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start by checking the repository root for the missing LICENSE file and reviewing how the bundled tree-sitter grammars and their upstream licenses are identified. Confirm the package’s governing license and the needed grammar attribution with maintainers; done means the repository contains the agreed LICENSE and, if needed, a NOTICE or documented attribution guidance.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Hi, and thanks for maintaining CodeEditLanguages — bundling the tree-sitter grammars into a single precompiled xcframework is a genuinely clean way to consume tree-sitter on macOS.
I'd like to depend on this package in a commercial macOS app and want to attribute it correctly, but I can't determine the license for this specific package: there's no LICENSE file in the repo root, and GitHub's license API returns nothing for it. The main CodeEdit app is MIT, but CodeEditLanguages doesn't appear to carry its own license file.
Could you help clarify:
-
What license governs
CodeEditLanguagesitself? Is it intended to be MIT, consistent with the rest of the CodeEdit org? If so, would you consider adding aLICENSEfile to the repo root so it's unambiguous and detectable by tooling (GitHub, SPM, license scanners)? -
Attribution for the bundled grammars — each upstream tree-sitter grammar carries its own license (MIT/Apache-2.0/etc.). Is there an aggregate
NOTICE/attribution you'd recommend bundling, or should consumers attribute each grammar from its upstream repo?
Happy to open a PR adding a LICENSE file (and a grammar NOTICE, if useful) if that would save you time. Thanks again!
- Dominant language
- Swift
- Stars
- 133
- Forks
- 56
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from CodeEditApp/CodeEditLanguages
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Syntax highlighting silently fails (and `Bundle.module` crashes) in SwiftPM CLI-built app bundles Open
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 45/100
CodeEditApp/CodeEditLanguages#93 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
bug
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
All issues in CodeEditApp/CodeEditLanguages
Similar issues
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
type: docs
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
googleapis/google-cloud-swift#971 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
bitcoindevkit/bdk-ffi#1125 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
mozilla-mobile/firefox-ios#35743 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
manaflow-ai/cmux#13417 ·