TDF_Label.FindAttribute segfaults when the attribute is absent

The issue names the Python binding entry point TDF_Label.FindAttribute but no source file or test. Start by locating that binding and run the minimal absent-attribute reproducer, then verify the present-attribute control case. Done means an absent attribute returns safely without SIGSEGV while the existing present-attribute behavior remains intact.

Summary

TDF_Label.FindAttribute segfaults when the requested attribute is not present on the label.
When the attribute is present it returns normally. There is no exception to catch — the process
dies with SIGSEGV.

This is related to #153 (open) and #55 (closed), but both of those report the attribute-present
path returning an unpopulated handle. The absent path crashing does not appear to be reported.

Minimal reproducer

No STEP file or external data needed:

from OCP.TCollection import TCollection_ExtendedString
from OCP.TDocStd import TDocStd_Document
from OCP.TDataStd import TDataStd_Name

doc = TDocStd_Document(TCollection_ExtendedString("XCAF"))
label = doc.Main()                                   # a label with no TDataStd_Name

print("IsAttribute:", label.IsAttribute(TDataStd_Name.GetID_s()))   # -> False, safe
n = TDataStd_Name()
label.FindAttribute(TDataStd_Name.GetID_s(), n)                     # -> SIGSEGV

IsAttribute: False
[1]    segmentation fault

Exit status 139.

Control: attribute present works

from OCP.TCollection import TCollection_ExtendedString
from OCP.TDocStd import TDocStd_Document
from OCP.TDataStd import TDataStd_Name

doc = TDocStd_Document(TCollection_ExtendedString("XCAF"))
label = doc.Main()
TDataStd_Name.Set_s(label, TCollection_ExtendedString("hello"))

n = TDataStd_Name()
print("returned:", label.FindAttribute(TDataStd_Name.GetID_s(), n))  # True
print("name:", n.Get().ToExtString())                                # hello

Runs clean, exit 0.

Not specific to TDataStd_Name

Same crash with the same shape of call:

attribute type	exit status
TDataStd_Name	139 (SIGSEGV)
TDataStd_Integer	139 (SIGSEGV)
TDataStd_Real	139 (SIGSEGV)

Environment

• cadquery-ocp-novtk 7.9.3.1 (OCCT 7.9.3)
• Python 3.14.7
• macOS 15 (Darwin 25.6.0), arm64

Safe alternatives

Both of these work on the exact label that crashes FindAttribute:

• label.IsAttribute(guid) returns False without crashing.
• TDF_AttributeIterator(label) enumerates the label's attributes normally. This is the
  reimplementation suggested in #153 and it appears to be the reliable path today.

Real-world impact

This is reachable from ordinary library code. build123d's import_step calls FindAttribute
unguarded on every assembly component label to read its name, so any STEP file containing an
assembly component without a name attribute kills the interpreter. I hit it on the public NIST
MBE PMI conformance model nist_ctc_02_asme1_ap242-e2.stp, whose component label carries
TNaming_NamedShape, TDataStd_UAttribute, TDF_TagSource and TDataStd_TreeNode but no
TDataStd_Name. Because it is a segfault rather than an exception, a service cannot defend itself
against it with try/except.

Note on cause

I have verified the behavioural boundary (absent → crash, present → fine, IsAttribute and
TDF_AttributeIterator safe) but not the underlying mechanism. Given #55 and #153 it looks like the
binding's handling of the Handle(TDF_Attribute)& out-parameter is wrong in a way that is merely
lossy when the attribute is found and memory-unsafe when it is not — but that is inference, not
something I have confirmed in the binding code.