open api version 3 support
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
Research direction
The issue proposes OpenAPI version 3 support for this command-line tool but names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating how the tool currently models and compares OpenAPI specifications; done would mean version 3 specifications are supported without breaking existing comparisons.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Hi,
I think that openapi version 3 support would be great for this tool. I am willing to help with this and create the necessary models that are different in version 3.
Would you be interested in this ?
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 290
- Forks
- 50
- Avg merge
- 2d 21h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Azure/openapi-diff
-
Azure/openapi-diff#482 · 1 assignee ·
-
Azure/openapi-diff#479 · 2 comments · 1 assignee ·
-
Azure/openapi-diff#456 · 1 assignee ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
Azure/openapi-diff#445 ·
-
Azure/openapi-diff#371 · 7 comments · 1 assignee ·
All issues in Azure/openapi-diff
Similar issues
-
Documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
cake-build/cake#5024 ·
-
Frontend status/draft TechnicalDebt
Difficulty 2/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 75/100
Altinn/altinn-auth#4143 ·
-
.NET Flaky Test Testing Tests
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
getsentry/sentry-dotnet#5617 · 1 comment ·
-
:watch: Not Triaged dotnet-fsharp/svc
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
Client customer-reported needs-team-attention question Service Attention WebPubSub
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-net#63292 · 3 comments · 1 reaction ·