Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Poison messages handling

Open
#1,040 6 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 3 days

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
csharp

Research direction

Start by tracing the PoisonMessageDetected and AbandoningMessage log paths, using issue #1039 for context. Verify the reported 600ms versus 600s wording and determine how poison-message dequeue limits and disposal should be specified; done means the behavior and visibility-delay message match the agreed handling.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

dt.azurestorage enhancement help wanted

As a rokochet of issue #1039 I've noticed that the message is being handled indefinitely.
I see the following traces in my logs:

PoisonMessageDetected: d8bdcf4d-ef40-4501-a99b-6e72309644ee: Message [TaskScheduled#1] with ID 6128efd4-8904-494d-9a2d-d2d8d01edbe7 has been dequeued 79 times and is now considered poison: {"Account":"...","TaskHub":"Services","...":"TaskScheduled","TaskEventId":1,"MessageId":"6128efd4-8904-494d-9a2d-d2d8d01edbe7","InstanceId":"d8bdcf4d-ef40-4501-a99b-6e72309644ee","ExecutionId":"b27db20915cf4e5db6cad3589dde88df","PartitionId":"...-workitems","DequeueCount":79}
AbandoningMessage: d8bdcf4d-ef40-4501-a99b-6e72309644ee: Abandoning [TaskScheduled#1] message back to ...-workitems and setting a visibility delay of 600ms: {"Account":"...","TaskHub":"...","EventType":"TaskScheduled","TaskEventId":1,"MessageId":"6128efd4-8904-494d-9a2d-d2d8d01edbe7","InstanceId":"d8bdcf4d-ef40-4501-a99b-6e72309644ee","ExecutionId":"b27db20915cf4e5db6cad3589dde88df","PartitionId":"services-workitems","SequenceNumber":208,"PopReceipt":"AgAAAAMAAAAAAAAAxVkNR+xc2gE=","VisibilityTimeoutSeconds":600}

Side note: the message say setting a visibility delay of 600ms, while the code actually delays for 600s (not ms).

Notice the DequeueCount value of 79 (I've seen values much higher). Perhaps there should be a setting that controls the maximum number of dequeues attempts, after which the message should just be disposed?

@cgillum @davidmrdavid

Dominant language
C#
Stars
1.7k
Forks
335
Avg merge
5d 3h
Merged PRs (30d)
8

Getting set up

This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from Azure/durabletask

All issues in Azure/durabletask

Similar issues

More C# issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.