Possibly allow autoscale to use load_formula for packing vs scatter in autoscale
@ryanhamel is already working on this.
Since Nov 8, 2021.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.
Description
We assume packing behavior regardless of load_formula, so that we don't autoscale over-aggressively. We may want a flag in autoscale.json to allow 'forced' spreading of work when calculating autoscale.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7
- Forks
- 18
- Avg merge
- 2d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Azure/cyclecloud-gridengine
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
All issues in Azure/cyclecloud-gridengine
Similar issues
-
essnmx good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
-
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · 1 comment ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Openarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·