Persist typed browser probe results for downstream recipe steps
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- typescript
Research direction
Start by locating the browser probe/page-evaluation commands and the recipe artifact registration flow. Trace how a typed result moves between recipe steps, then add contract and recipe integration tests covering successful reads and rejected paths; done means omitted output preserves existing behavior and persistence failures are distinguished.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Problem
Recipe browser probes can evaluate runtime page state, but cannot write the typed result to a caller-selected artifact path that a later recipe step can consume. This blocks pre-compilation runtime presentation evidence workflows.
Direction
Add a generic output-artifact contract to browser probe/page-evaluation commands. Persist the typed result atomically within the declared artifact root, register an artifact ref, and make it available to subsequent workflow steps.
Acceptance
- Caller can declare a safe relative output artifact path.
- Typed browser result is atomically persisted and registered.
- A later recipe step can read the file in the same run.
- Path traversal and writes outside the artifact root are rejected.
- Failure evidence distinguishes evaluation, serialization, and persistence errors.
- Existing browser probe behavior is unchanged when omitted.
- Contract and recipe integration tests cover success and rejection.
Dependency
Automattic/static-site-importer#796, producer commit f246198c; Automattic/blocks-engine#757.
AI assistance
OpenAI gpt-5.6-sol through OpenCode analyzed the cross-recipe gap and drafted this issue. Chris Huber remains responsible for scope and implementation decisions.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 17
- Forks
- 4
- Avg merge
- 1h 11m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 39
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Automattic/wp-codebox
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Automattic/wp-codebox#2531 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
Automattic/wp-codebox#2467 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
Automattic/wp-codebox#2466 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Automattic/wp-codebox#2105 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Automattic/wp-codebox#2061 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in Automattic/wp-codebox
Similar issues
-
bug HemiStake
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
hemilabs/ui-monorepo#2413 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
component/ui framework/react kind/bug language/javascript
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
meshery/meshery#22216 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
paperclipai/paperclip#14982 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
lingdojo/kana-dojo#31515 · 1 comment · 5 reactions ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day