Docs: README license section disagrees with LICENSE file (MIT vs Apache-2.0)

Open Beginner friendly
#80 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
1/5
Estimated time
Under an hour
Newbie friendliness
70/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Stale
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Compare the root README's License section with the root LICENSE file, which contains the Apache License 2.0 text. Update the README so it identifies Apache-2.0, then verify that the two files agree.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

The root LICENSE file contains the full text of the Apache License 2.0 and GitHub correctly labels the project as Apache-2.0. However, the README’s License section states that the project uses the MIT License.

Dominant language
CSS
Stars
857
Forks
131
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from AnswerDotAI/fasthtml-example

All issues in AnswerDotAI/fasthtml-example

Similar issues

More Documentation issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.