Onboarding funnel events cannot be correlated into a single run
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- typescript
Research direction
Start at the CLI entry path and worker startup described in the issue, then trace how the existing telemetry event envelope is created in each thread. Done means every listed onboarding and gateway-auth event from one launch carries the same non-persisted identifier across both telemetry module instances; verify the existing telemetry flow and, if in scope, the machine-id creation race.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Problem
Onboarding telemetry events cannot be correlated into a single user's funnel, because the events that make up one first run are emitted from two different threads at times when no common identifier exists.
altimate-code tui runs the TUI on the process main thread and the HTTP server in a worker. Each loads its own instance of the telemetry module. The first-run UI events (onboarding_started, model_picker_shown, provider_selected, the Big Pickle pair, onboarding_completed, the scan-gate pair) and the gateway auth events all fire before any chat session exists, so they stamp an empty session_id and land under the synthetic startup session. The activation events (activation_menu_shown, activation_job_selected, first_job_completed, first_prompt_sent) fire later from a real session and carry its real id.
The result: the top of the funnel and the bottom of the funnel share no key.
There is a fallback identifier — machine_id, a random UUID at ~/.altimate/machine-id — but it is unreliable for exactly this case. On a genuinely new install both threads can observe the file missing and independently create it, so a single first run can emit two different machine_id values. (That race is worth fixing regardless, and is cheap: create the file exclusively and re-read on collision.)
Impact
Countable today: impressions, choices, gateway auth outcomes, scan/skip splits, sample setup invocations — anything that is a simple tally of one event type.
Not answerable today:
- End-to-end conversion. "How many people who saw the picker ended up connected?" requires linking a
model_picker_shownto anonboarding_completed. - Per-attempt drop-off.
onboarding_abandonedcarries alast_stage, but it cannot be tied to the events that led there. - Retry behaviour. A user who fails gateway auth and succeeds on the second attempt is indistinguishable from two users.
time_to_connect_msattribution when a user retries.
In other words: the events are individually correct, but the funnel is not reconstructable, which is the main thing the taxonomy exists for.
Proposal
Generate one random id per process launch and stamp it on every onboarding event, from both threads.
- Generated once in the CLI entry path, before either thread emits.
- Passed to the worker at startup so both telemetry module instances use the same value.
- Not persisted, not derived from anything about the machine or user, and not reused across launches. It carries no identifying information — it exists only to group events that belong to the same run.
A launch is the right grain here: onboarding state already resets on every process start by design, so "one launch" and "one onboarding attempt" are the same thing in practice.
Alternatives considered
- Reuse
machine_id. Groups a machine, not an attempt, so retries and repeat launches collapse together. Also affected by the creation race above. - Reuse
session_id. Does not exist for most of the funnel, which is the original problem. - Fix attribution after the fact by joining on timestamp proximity. Fragile, and impossible to do correctly for concurrent instances on the same machine.
Notes
This does not require a new sink, endpoint, or storage. It is one value threaded through the existing event envelope.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 813
- Forks
- 134
- Avg merge
- 2d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 67
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from AltimateAI/altimate-code
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1359 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1323 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1288 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1285 ·
-
privacy: Altimate Base consent dialog no longer discloses persistent per-installation identifier Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1284 ·
All issues in AltimateAI/altimate-code
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
bcgov/bc-wallet-mobile#4761 · 1 comment ·
-
external-issue to-triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
area-deployment area-integrations triage:bot-seen
Difficulty 2/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
refactor
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100