[Feature] 希望作者不要急于开发ai相关的能力，更应该聚焦于idea常用功能的实现
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- developer-experience
Research direction
The issue discusses prioritizing common IDE and Git workflows, including creating a branch from another branch and editing changes during a Git comparison, but it does not identify files or a specific change to make. Start by reviewing the editor's existing Git and comparison workflows and the project's feature requests. Done would require a defined, prioritized feature with clear acceptance criteria.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Problem to solve / 要解决的问题
当前不选择idea不是因为idea ai做的不够好，功能不完善才选择lithe工具的，如果要ai支持友好，大可以选择VSCode类的工具。更看重的是lithe能解决idea占用内存太高的问题，目前内存太贵，电脑内存是个瓶颈。
ai开发有更好的agent工具，在目前使用的过程中，发现idea很多常用的功能都没有，比如git通过某个分支新建分支这样常见的能力都没有。再比如git对比的时候支持修改，比如说在对比的过程中某个小地方想加点东西，目前在对比页面不支持。
ai能力的支持固然挺好，但是个人觉得不应该作为当前编辑器最优先迭代的地方。做的再好也不可能比得过codex或者claude code这类的agent，上限非常有限。工作中常见的ai应用才是最有用的，比如现在编辑器支持ai生成commit就是很实用的功能，在日常开发中也经常用到。
以上是个人建议，不代表所有用户。
Proposed solution / 建议方案
建议优先迭代日常开发中idea最常用的能力，而不是ai能力的迭代作为最高优先级。
最近的发版中，看到很多功能都和ai相关，但是个人又基本用不到。
Target platform / 目标平台
Windows
Area / 模块
Editor / 编辑器
Priority / 优先级
P0 / 立即处理：已严重影响使用体验，核心流程受阻或无法正常使用
Alternatives considered / 已考虑的替代方案
No response
Additional context / 补充信息
No response
Checklist / 提交前检查
- I searched existing issues for duplicates. / 我已搜索现有 Issue，确认没有重复建议。
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 1.8k
- Forks
- 151
- Avg merge
- 11h 57m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 337
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from 1lck/Lithe-IDEA
-
area:editor bug P0 platform:macos review: low
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
1lck/Lithe-IDEA#1118 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area:git bug issue-form:bug P1 platform:windows review: low
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
1lck/Lithe-IDEA#1566 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug] 全局搜索逻辑匹配问题Possibly taken @arkleselect claimed this today. Openarea:editor bug issue-form:bug P0 platform:macos review: medium
1lck/Lithe-IDEA#1564 · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area:run bug P1 platform:windows review: low
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
1lck/Lithe-IDEA#1562 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Feature] 功能建议Openarea:editor enhancement issue-form:feature P1 platform:windows review: low
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
1lck/Lithe-IDEA#1560 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Graphify-Labs/graphify#4860 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
sveltejs/eslint-plugin-svelte#1615 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
-
Parallel reticle_verify opens per-flow leases without the source lease's ignoreHTTPSErrorsPossibly taken @as992949791 claimed this today. Opengood first issue help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
reticlehq/reticle#2033 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day