rtk-ai/rtk

License for the repo and official website is different

Open

#1,064 创建于 2026年4月7日

在 GitHub 查看
 (3 评论) (0 反应) (0 负责人)Rust (48,085 star) (2,914 fork)batch import
documentationeffort-smallgood first issue

描述

I see the license for the repo is "Apache 2.0", but for the official website is using "MIT". Also license declarations are inconsistent across project metadata and docs. Cargo says MIT, LICENSE file is Apache-2.0 text, README says MIT.

Which one is the correct one?

@pszymkowiak

贡献者指南

技术栈
rust
领域
documentation
议题类型
documentation
难度面向新贡献者的预计实现难度，1 表示很小改动，5 表示专家级工作。
1
预计时间有经验贡献者完成调查、实现、测试并准备 pull request 的粗略时间范围。
under 1 hour
活动状态议题当前的可参与程度：新鲜、活跃、陈旧、阻塞或等待维护者输入。
needs maintainer response
清晰度议题是否清楚说明期望改动、验收标准和下一步。
clear
前置要求
basic Rust project structurelicense file format
新手友好度1-100 的估计分数，表示该议题对首次贡献者的友好程度。
80
研究方向
The issue reports inconsistent license declarations: the LICENSE file contains Apache 2.0 text, while Cargo.toml and README state MIT, and the official website uses MIT. The maintainer (@pszymkowiak) is mentioned and needs to respond to clarify which license is correct. Once decided, the fix involves updating the LICENSE file and synchronizing metadata across Cargo.toml, README, and potentially the website repository.
License for the repo and official website is different · rtk-ai/rtk#1064 | Good First Issue