refined-github/refined-github

`sort-conversations-by-update-time` conflicts with new PR inbox

Open

#9,604 创建于 2026年5月25日

在 GitHub 查看
 (1 评论) (0 反应) (0 负责人)TypeScript (22,918 star) (1,423 fork)batch import
bughelp wanted

描述

Many issues

The global link is hijacked to skip the inbox

GitHub now defaults to the inbox and this can be an option. sort-conversations-by-update-time however will add ?q= to the URL, which causes GitHub to redirect to https://github.com/pulls/search?q=sort%3Aupdated-desc+is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+author%3A%40me+archived%3Afalse+ instead

The sidebar links are already sorted by update time

So the URL should be excluded from sort-conversations-by-update-time

See: https://github.com/pulls/authored

The sidebar links are not recognized correctly

The links are altered from https://github.com/pulls/reviews to https://github.com/pulls/reviews?q=sort%3Aupdated-desc+is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+

Our SearchQuery utility is set up to recognize the pathnames and understand the implied q parameter. Notice how the new q parameter does not include the expected review-requested:@me query

The sidebar links are ignored by GitHub

Even if the links are altered, clicking them will cause GitHub to just load the hardcoded query. This is good considering the bug in the previous section, but if you alt-click the link you'll end up on this non-sensical page:

I think that fixing point 2 or 3 already addresses this issue.

贡献者指南

技术栈
typescript
领域
frontenddeveloper experience
议题类型
bug
难度面向新贡献者的预计实现难度，1 表示很小改动，5 表示专家级工作。
3
预计时间有经验贡献者完成调查、实现、测试并准备 pull request 的粗略时间范围。
half day
活动状态议题当前的可参与程度：新鲜、活跃、陈旧、阻塞或等待维护者输入。
fresh
清晰度议题是否清楚说明期望改动、验收标准和下一步。
mostly clear
前置要求
Basic understanding of GitHub's PR inboxFamiliarity with browser extension URL modificationKnowledge of the extension's SearchQuery utility
新手友好度1-100 的估计分数，表示该议题对首次贡献者的友好程度。
60
研究方向
The issue identifies four problems with the `sort conversations by update time` feature conflicting with GitHub's new PR inbox UI. The main fix likely involves updating the URL modification logic in the extension to exclude the new inbox URLs (like `/pulls/authored`, `/pulls/reviews`, etc.) from being altered. Investigate the `SearchQuery` utility to understand how it parses and appends `q` parameters. Also check the behavior of sidebar links and how they are handled. Possible approach: add a condition to skip URL manipulation on paths that GitHub already handles with its own query sorting. Look at recent commits to see if any changes have been made to the inbox feature. Refer to the images for visual references of the issue.