llvm/llvm-project

[LLDB] Swig python extensions are missing test coverage

Open

#168,920 创建于 2025年11月20日

在 GitHub 查看
 (14 评论) (2 反应) (0 负责人)C++ (26,378 star) (10,782 fork)batch import
good first issuelldbtest-suite

描述

@jimingham pointed out on #168619 that a lot of the lldb extensions are either not tested or don't have direct testing. I've opened this issue as a good new user issue.

The largest offenders are

While target and valueobject actually have more properties, a quick grep showed a lot of these are exercised in existing tests.

贡献者指南

技术栈
pythoncpp
领域
testing
议题类型
test
难度面向新贡献者的预计实现难度，1 表示很小改动，5 表示专家级工作。
2
预计时间有经验贡献者完成调查、实现、测试并准备 pull request 的粗略时间范围。
half day
活动状态议题当前的可参与程度：新鲜、活跃、陈旧、阻塞或等待维护者输入。
active
清晰度议题是否清楚说明期望改动、验收标准和下一步。
mostly clear
前置要求
Pythonbasic SWIGLLDB
新手友好度1-100 的估计分数，表示该议题对首次贡献者的友好程度。
75
研究方向
Focus on SBProcessExtensions.i in the lldb bindings directory. Look at existing tests for SBFrameExtensions and SBTargetExtensions for patterns. Open the SWIG interface file and identify exposed functions/methods, then write test cases that exercise them. Review the LLDB test infrastructure (e.g., lldb/test/API) for how to add Python based tests.