google/flatbuffers

Bazel rule rewrite

Open

#8,941 创建于 2026年2月26日

在 GitHub 查看
 (2 评论) (0 反应) (0 负责人)C++ (25,952 star) (3,564 fork)batch import
CIhelp wanted

描述

For my use case the existing flatbuffers_cc_library isn't sufficient. For example, it can't accept filegroups as source arguments. I think the best way to handle this would be to write new idiomatic Bazel rules from scratch using providers, custom rules instead of genrules, etc. To start, it would probably make sense to implement these rules in parallel to the existing rules to give people time to migrate.

I'm willing to implement this--would such a PR be accepted or would I be better off creating a separate rules_flatbuffers project? Thanks for any advice!

贡献者指南

技术栈
cpp
领域
build system
议题类型
feature
难度面向新贡献者的预计实现难度，1 表示很小改动，5 表示专家级工作。
5
预计时间有经验贡献者完成调查、实现、测试并准备 pull request 的粗略时间范围。
over 1 week
活动状态议题当前的可参与程度：新鲜、活跃、陈旧、阻塞或等待维护者输入。
needs maintainer response
清晰度议题是否清楚说明期望改动、验收标准和下一步。
mostly clear
前置要求
BazelC++flatbuffers internals
新手友好度1-100 的估计分数，表示该议题对首次贡献者的友好程度。
10
研究方向
The issue proposes rewriting Bazel rules for flatbuffers using providers and custom rules to support filegroups as input. The author is willing to implement but awaits maintainer approval on whether to integrate into the main repository or create a separate rules flatbuffers project. Newcomers should monitor the discussion for maintainer response and clarification of acceptance criteria. The existing `flatbuffers cc library` rule file is a key reference.