borgbackup/borg

FUSE micro-opt benchmarking

开放

#5,110 创建于 2020年4月13日

 (5 条评论) (0 个反应) (0 位负责人)Python (732 个派生)batch import
cmd: mounteasygood first issuehelp wanted

仓库指标

星标
 (10,086 个星标)
PR 合并指标
 (PR 指标待抓取)

描述

If somebody has some time for FUSE benchmarking:

diff --git a/src/borg/fuse.py b/src/borg/fuse.py
index 429790e4..27ab1c1a 100644
--- a/src/borg/fuse.py
+++ b/src/borg/fuse.py
@@ -644,12 +644,12 @@ def read(self, fh, offset, size):
                 data = self.data_cache[id]
                 if offset + n == len(data):
                     # evict fully read chunk from cache
-                    del self.data_cache[id]
+                    pass # del self.data_cache[id]
             else:
                 data = self.key.decrypt(id, self.repository_uncached.get(id))
-                if offset + n < len(data):
+                if True: # offset + n < len(data):
                     # chunk was only partially read, cache it
                     self.data_cache[id] = data
             parts.append(data[offset:offset + n])
             offset = 0
             size -= n

The 2 changes remove selective caching only of partially read chunks and cache removal of fully read chunks. While this sounds obvious when thinking about sequential reads, it maybe is counterproductive for repeating chunks (like all-zero chunks).

If someone wants to benchmark these (and maybe also try with a bigger sized self.data_cache), that would be helpful!

Try:

  • big files, small files
  • files with repeating chunks (like sparse [VM] disk images)
  • default chunksize, small chunksize

贡献者指南