Effort: ModerateExperimentation NeededHelp WantedRevisitSuggestion
仓库指标
- 星标
- (108,860 个星标)
- PR 合并指标
- (PR 指标待抓取)
描述
Type queries combined with indexed access types currently produce a parse tree that is surprising in its behavior.
One would think that typeof Foo['bar'] would be parsed as typeof (Foo['bar']), which would really be something like typeof Foo.bar.
That's not the case. It's actually parsed as (typeof Foo)['bar'].
Conveniently, it seems that semantically (when type-checking) these are identical, but it seems strange for syntactic consumers. Do we believe this is currently working as intended?