GoogleChromeLabs/worker-plugin

worker_threads compatibility?

Open

#10 创建于 2018年10月9日

在 GitHub 查看
 (12 评论) (3 反应) (0 负责人)JavaScript (1,908 star) (88 fork)batch import
enhancementhelp wanted

描述

Understood if this is off-topic, and feel free to close, but I was just wondering if you'd considered compatibility with Node.js worker_threads here at all?

It seems like the sort of thing that would be generally useful for Node.js optimization as well, in having some kind of --node output, since you're already in the game of worker builds.

Although perhaps, a translation layer from web-style workers to Node.js-style worker_threads would be the better route as its own project.

Otherwise do you know anyone working on this problem / who considers this important?

贡献者指南

技术栈
javascript
领域
backendperformance
议题类型
feature
难度面向新贡献者的预计实现难度，1 表示很小改动，5 表示专家级工作。
3
预计时间有经验贡献者完成调查、实现、测试并准备 pull request 的粗略时间范围。
half day
活动状态议题当前的可参与程度：新鲜、活跃、陈旧、阻塞或等待维护者输入。
stale
清晰度议题是否清楚说明期望改动、验收标准和下一步。
needs investigation
前置要求
Web WorkersNode.js worker threadsWebpack plugin development
新手友好度1-100 的估计分数，表示该议题对首次贡献者的友好程度。
30
研究方向
Explore the existing worker plugin codebase to understand how Web Workers are bundled. Review the 12 comments in the issue for any suggested approaches or concerns. Investigate if there is a way to map Web Worker APIs to Node.js worker threads, possibly by creating a translation layer. Check if any external projects or proposals exist for this compatibility. Consider the maintainer's view on whether this aligns with the project's scope.