Gallopsled/pwntools

Switch to coveralls github action instead of running commands manually

Open

#2,480 创建于 2024年10月2日

在 GitHub 查看
 (0 评论) (0 反应) (0 负责人)Python (11,127 star) (1,684 fork)batch import
featuregood first issuetesting

描述

We should consider using https://github.com/marketplace/actions/coveralls-github-action#complete-parallel-job-example instead of our own solution. That would have avoided the hidden-files problem when combining the coverage data manually.

贡献者指南

技术栈
pythongithub actions
领域
devopsci cd
议题类型
refactor
难度面向新贡献者的预计实现难度，1 表示很小改动，5 表示专家级工作。
2
预计时间有经验贡献者完成调查、实现、测试并准备 pull request 的粗略时间范围。
1-3 hours
活动状态议题当前的可参与程度：新鲜、活跃、陈旧、阻塞或等待维护者输入。
fresh
清晰度议题是否清楚说明期望改动、验收标准和下一步。
clear
前置要求
GitHub Actions basicsYAML syntax
新手友好度1-100 的估计分数，表示该议题对首次贡献者的友好程度。
70
研究方向
Examine the current coverage reporting workflow in .github/workflows (likely a YAML file). Compare the manual commands with the Coveralls GitHub Action example provided. Propose a pull request that replaces the manual steps with the action, ensuring parallel jobs and coverage collection are handled correctly.