EsotericSoftware/kryo

VersionedRecordSerializer?

Open

#884 创建于 2022年2月14日

在 GitHub 查看
 (11 评论) (0 反应) (0 负责人)HTML (6,052 star) (816 fork)batch import
feature requesthelp wanted

描述

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I'm trying to serialize a Record that evolves - new components are being added to it.

Describe the solution you'd like Would it make sense to create a VersionedRecordSerializer akin to VersionedFieldSerializer with the same functionality, the @Since annotation?

Describe alternatives you've considered An obvious workaround is to use a traditional class instead of a record.

贡献者指南

技术栈
java
领域
backend
议题类型
feature
难度面向新贡献者的预计实现难度，1 表示很小改动，5 表示专家级工作。
3
预计时间有经验贡献者完成调查、实现、测试并准备 pull request 的粗略时间范围。
half day
活动状态议题当前的可参与程度：新鲜、活跃、陈旧、阻塞或等待维护者输入。
stale
清晰度议题是否清楚说明期望改动、验收标准和下一步。
mostly clear
前置要求
JavaKryo basics
新手友好度1-100 的估计分数，表示该议题对首次贡献者的友好程度。
30
研究方向
Examine the existing VersionedFieldSerializer implementation and the @Since annotation. The issue proposes a similar serializer for Records. The workaround using a traditional class suggests the current Record serialization lacks versioning. A solution would involve extending Kryo's RecordSerializer to support @Since, similar to FieldSerializer. The discussion may indicate design choices. Review comments for maintainer feedback.