tursodatabase/libsql

Improve database connection builder API?

Open

#1,635 建立於 2024年8月5日

在 GitHub 查看
 (1 留言) (0 反應) (0 負責人)C (16,744 star) (490 fork)batch import
Embedded Replicasenhancementhelp wantedquestion

描述

The new_remote_replica() and new_local_replica() names are weird because in both cases the replica is local. The difference is just with how they are synced.

My proposal is to keep new_local() and new_remote() but add additional with_remote_sync() and with_file_sync() methods to the builder for local database variant.

貢獻者指南

技術棧
rust
領域
developer experiencedatabase
議題類型
feature
難度面向新貢獻者的預計實作難度，1 表示很小改動，5 表示專家級工作。
3
預計時間有經驗貢獻者完成調查、實作、測試並準備 pull request 的粗略時間範圍。
1-3 hours
活動狀態議題目前的可參與程度：新鮮、活躍、陳舊、阻塞或等待維護者輸入。
needs maintainer response
清晰度議題是否清楚說明預期改動、驗收標準和下一步。
clear
前置要求
Rust programmingbasics of libsql client API
新手友善度1-100 的估計分數，表示該議題對首次貢獻者的友善程度。
70
研究方向
Explore the Rust client SDK for libsql, specifically the database connection builder implementation. Look at the existing `new remote replica()` and `new local replica()` functions in the source code (likely in a builder module). Understand the builder pattern used and how to add methods like `with remote sync()` and `with file sync()`. Reference the issue comments for any maintainer feedback.