scala/scala3
在 GitHub 查看Match type syntax does not allow writing type patterns for type members directly
Open
#13,416 建立於 2021年8月29日
area:match-typeshelp wanteditype:enhancement
倉庫指標
- Star
- (6,247 star)
- PR 合併指標
- (平均合併 18天 14小時) (30 天內合併 133 個 PR)
描述
Minimized code
trait RDF {
type Triple
}
object RDF {
type Triple[R <: RDF] = R match {
case (RDF { type Triple = t }) => t
}
type GetTriple[T] = RDF { type Triple = T }
}
Output
Not found: type t
Expectation
Expected to be able to extract a variable type from inside a type refinement.
This syntax limit can be worked around by introducing a "pattern type":
trait RDF {
type Triple
}
object RDF {
type Triple[R <: RDF] = R match {
case GetTriple[t] => t
}
type GetTriple[T] = RDF { type Triple = T }
}
Why write something like that? Apparently this pattern of extracting a field using a match type can substitute for some usages of generalized type projections and is enough to port some of the libraries using type projections, e.g. https://github.com/bblfish/banana-play