rtk-ai/rtk

License for the repo and official website is different

Open

#1,064 建立於 2026年4月7日

在 GitHub 查看
 (3 留言) (0 反應) (0 負責人)Rust (48,085 star) (2,914 fork)batch import
documentationeffort-smallgood first issue

描述

I see the license for the repo is "Apache 2.0", but for the official website is using "MIT". Also license declarations are inconsistent across project metadata and docs. Cargo says MIT, LICENSE file is Apache-2.0 text, README says MIT.

Which one is the correct one?

@pszymkowiak

貢獻者指南

技術棧
rust
領域
documentation
議題類型
documentation
難度面向新貢獻者的預計實作難度，1 表示很小改動，5 表示專家級工作。
1
預計時間有經驗貢獻者完成調查、實作、測試並準備 pull request 的粗略時間範圍。
under 1 hour
活動狀態議題目前的可參與程度：新鮮、活躍、陳舊、阻塞或等待維護者輸入。
needs maintainer response
清晰度議題是否清楚說明預期改動、驗收標準和下一步。
clear
前置要求
basic Rust project structurelicense file format
新手友善度1-100 的估計分數，表示該議題對首次貢獻者的友善程度。
80
研究方向
The issue reports inconsistent license declarations: the LICENSE file contains Apache 2.0 text, while Cargo.toml and README state MIT, and the official website uses MIT. The maintainer (@pszymkowiak) is mentioned and needs to respond to clarify which license is correct. Once decided, the fix involves updating the LICENSE file and synchronizing metadata across Cargo.toml, README, and potentially the website repository.