[BUG] Jackson annotation @JsonProperty not working with @Jacksonized - 2

Describe the bug Similarly to the issue reported in https://github.com/projectlombok/lombok/issues/2824, I'm having issues when using @JsonProperty with @Jacksonized when using @JsonProperty on the getter. "Why are you doing that?", you ask. Well, I'm not. But openapi-generator is.

To Reproduce

    @Builder
    @NoArgsConstructor
    @AllArgsConstructor
    @Jacksonized
    private static class JacksonExample {
        private String name;
        private int age;

        @JsonProperty("my_name")
        public String getName() {
            return name;
        }

        public void setName(String name) {
            this.name = name;
        }

        public int getAge() {
            return age;
        }

        public void setAge(int age) {
            this.age = age;
        }
    }

    @Test
    public void jsonPropertyAnnotationLetsYouMapAPropertyToAFieldWithDifferentName() throws Exception {
        JacksonExample jacksonExample = JacksonExample.builder()
                                                      .age(27)
                                                      .name("Joe")
                                                      .build();
        String json = "{\"my_name\": \"Joe\", \"age\": 27}";

        ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
        JacksonExample result = objectMapper.readValue(json, JacksonExample.class);

        assertEquals(jacksonExample, result);
    }

This gives me:

com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.exc.UnrecognizedPropertyException: Unrecognized field "my_name" (class com.whatever.Test$JacksonExample$JacksonExampleBuilder), not marked as ignorable (2 known properties: "name", "age"])
 at [Source: (String)"{"my_name": "Joe", "age": 27}"; line: 1, column: 14] (through reference chain: com.sesame.bison.pubsub.PhotonUserPrescriptionReceiverTest$JacksonExample$JacksonExampleBuilder["my_name"])

Expected behavior I would expect the value to be deserialized correctly. Alternatively, I'd like an exception to be thrown, if this is indeed not supported.

Version info (please complete the following information):

• Lombok version: 1.18.32
• Platform: javac 21

Additional context You could argue that this issue should be raised with the openapi-generator folks, but we are the ones adding @Jacksonized (for reasons that have been lost to time, but presumably it was needed). To be clear, I don't expect you to support any and all wacky combinations of annotations. But there's clearly an assumption that having these annotations on the getter should be sufficient. Maybe the openapi-generator folks are wrong about this. That's a possibility.

Should I expect this to work when only the getter is annotated, or must the annotation be attached to the field?