envoyproxy/envoy

TCP traffic tapping doesn't support any matching other than "any"

Open

#13,803 建立於 2020年10月28日

在 GitHub 查看
 (1 留言) (0 反應) (0 負責人)C++ (5,373 fork)batch import
area/taphelp wanted

倉庫指標

Star
 (27,997 star)
PR 合併指標
 (平均合併 8天) (30 天內合併 378 個 PR)

描述

I've been experimenting with TCP traffic tapping of an upstream cluster. E.g.,:

"transport_socket": {
    "name": "envoy.transport_sockets.tap",
    "typed_config": {
      "@type": "type.googleapis.com/envoy.extensions.transport_sockets.tap.v3.Tap",
      "common_config": {
        "admin_config": {
          "config_id": "mtu.hserver-multi-tenant-upstream.cerberus"
        }
      },
      "transport_socket": {
        "name": "envoy.transport_sockets.tls"
      }
    }
  },

This example uses the admin_config, but that's not important. My question concerns the static_config alternative as well. Continuing with the admin config example, however, if I post this document to the /tap endpoint, it captures traffic:

config_id: mtu.hserver-multi-tenant-upstream.cerberus
tap_config:
    match:
        any_match: true
    output_config:
        streaming: true
        sinks:
            - streaming_admin: {}

But if I post this document, with different match criteria, it never captures traffic, even when the header exists:

config_id: mtu.hserver-multi-tenant-upstream.cerberus
tap_config:
    match:
        http_request_headers_match:
            headers:
                - name: x-capture
                  present_match: true
    output_config:
        streaming: true
        sinks:
            - streaming_admin: {}

Possibly this is intentional. After all, I'm tapping at the TCP level, not the HTTP level. But the documentation doesn't say anything about matching (except for "any") not working when tapping at the TCP level. So I don't know if this is a bug or a documentation deficiency.

I tested with Envoy version

40de14954b29b4c1c87793482b90b27da3370f0f/1.17.0-dev/Clean/RELEASE/BoringSSL

貢獻者指南