Microsoft/TypeScript

Covariant generic parameters fail unification

開放

#61,503 建立於 2025年3月28日

 (0 則留言) (0 個反應) (0 位負責人)TypeScript (13,395 個分叉)batch import
BugDomain: check: Type InferenceHelp Wanted

倉庫指標

星標
 (108,860 顆星)
PR 合併指標
 (PR 指標待抓取)

描述

🔎 Search Terms

"contravariant", "unification"

🕗 Version & Regression Information

  • This changed between versions 3.3.3 and 3.5.1

⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?jsx=0#code/MYewdgzgLgBKZQE4EMBuzEEtkJgXhgAoBKfAPhgG8AoGOcaegWwCNMwBTfGAHgGEoADzKEA+gEYAXEWCSBg0ngpgArgBs1AGhiiATNMKz5i5erXEDJmPPJErKsABMOAM3YdHMZBC9gAngDc1LT0kLBqHBAQovDQWJyeBPwwHIJQHE4+lBFgAOZQABaSqqwciAC+IrLWFjCqGrb1akF0sbBMIIgcMQxI7om8fClpGY5ZOflFJSxl2sAFGHwgzgCCUGLFKqWIFtNllYbSfLVNjWYtoYzp0OLcoKzuhBFRPWHxHtodXa9x-cQXbRg1ygujuIAenEIX26bXejm0z2isL+AN6MEQ3GB4hIQXKwUBoHQWBwsAIJFsNFaaPubE43H4QhEEkstnk2j0LKU1iEtRsXIczjcCS8PhwgWCVLCMERPz6wqSQ1S6UyVAmhU22wOvNsAtc-RFvnFksY0NlcPpipGKuyGUmGpmiDmC0QS1W61E9rKuy2Dq1Rx1Tj1wu8htRUqxYIhHCekSRvThn06MPjKJCgOBoIINMepuRCQRsbNqfKQA

💻 Code

const contravariant = () => {
  const combine = <Ctx>(_1: (c:Ctx) => null, _2: (c:Ctx) => null): () => Ctx => () => undefined as any;

  const less_constrined = <C extends {length:number}>(c: C): null => null;
  const more_constrined = <C extends {length:number, charCodeAt(_:number):number}>(c: C): null => null;
  const test1 = combine(less_constrined, more_constrined);
  const test2 = combine(more_constrined, less_constrined);
}

const covariant = () => {
  const combine = <Ctx>(_1: () => Ctx, _2: () => Ctx): Ctx => undefined as any;

  const less_constrined = <C extends {length:number}>(): C => undefined as any;
  const more_constrined = <C extends {length:number, charCodeAt(_:number):number}>(): C => undefined as any;
  const test1 = combine(less_constrined, more_constrined);
  const test2 = combine(more_constrined, less_constrined);
}

🙁 Actual behavior

In the contravariant example the type is inferred from the first argument, so test1 fails to typecheck, despite both test1 and test2 sharing the same argument types, just reversed. This is also different from the covariant case where types are properly unified in both test1 and test2

🙂 Expected behavior

The behaviour for the covariant and contravariant case should match, so test1 should be inferred as <C extends { length: number; charCodeAt(_: number): number; }>() => C

Additional information about the issue

No response

貢獻者指南