07_tenant_screening_bias_audit.ipynb's Key Insight cites numbers that match nothing - not its own cells, not unfair.py/fair.py, not the README
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Newbie friendliness
- 94/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- jupyter-notebook, python
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Open notebooks/07_tenant_screening_bias_audit.ipynb and compare cell 17 with the outputs in cells 12, 14, and 16. Verify the figures against Tenant Screening/unfair.py, fair.py, and the folder README.md, then update the Key Insight so its values match and confirm no unrelated notebook content changes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Where: notebooks/07_tenant_screening_bias_audit.ipynb, cells 12/14/16 (code) vs. cell 17 (markdown "Key Insight").
The gap: cells 12/14/16 actually print:
Fairness Gap: 6.68% (cell 12, biased)
New Fairness Gap: 5.16%, p=0.0004 (cell 14, fair)
Reduction: 23% (cell 16, summary)
These exactly match Tenant Screening/unfair.py/fair.py run directly, and the folder's README.md ("Race | 6.68% | 5.16% | 23%"). But cell 17's Key Insight claims: "Dropping Race and all twelve proxies cuts the gap from 7.17% to 5.07%, a 29% reduction... the residual disparity is significant (p=0.0007)." None of 7.17%, 5.07%, 29%, or p=0.0007 appear anywhere else - not in this notebook's own output, not in the reference scripts, not in the README.
Fix direction: correct the Key Insight text to "6.68% to 5.16%, a 23% reduction... (p=0.0004)".
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 47
- Forks
- 45
- Avg merge
- 1h 56m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 96
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from yakew7/Fair-Code
-
documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
documentation good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
-
bug documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
documentation good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
-
bug
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
All issues in yakew7/Fair-Code
Similar issues
-
user-reported
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Kong/developer.konghq.com#7316 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
HarperFast/skills#96 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
infinispan/infinispan#18150 ·
-
bug triage:deciding
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
open-telemetry/otel-arrow#4132 ·
-
Ecosystem: ClawMetry — the Qwen Code reader is now free and open source (follow-up to #9294 / #9338) Opencategory/integration priority/P3 scope/documentation status/ready-for-human type/feature-request
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 84/100