Add an alternative way to represent trait contracts

Open
#2 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
15/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
rust
Domain
tooling

Research direction

Start with the linked GitLab issue 5, since the GitHub issue does not describe the alternative representation or its requirements. Then inspect the Rust crate's procedural-macro implementation. The work is complete only when the linked proposal's intended trait-contract representation and acceptance criteria are defined and implemented.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

see https://gitlab.com/karroffel/contracts/-/issues/5

Dominant language
Rust
Stars
51
Forks
2
Avg merge
2h 29m
Merged PRs (30d)
6

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from x52dev/contracts

All issues in x52dev/contracts

Similar issues

More Rust issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.