Can this be replaced by webassembly version?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
Research direction
The issue has no body and names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing the repository's current C implementation and the existing issue discussion, then determine the scope and feasibility of replacing it with WebAssembly; done means a documented, agreed replacement plan or an explicitly implemented and validated migration.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This issue has no description.
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 169
- Forks
- 49
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from websockets/bufferutil
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
websockets/bufferutil#168 · 1 comment ·
All issues in websockets/bufferutil
Similar issues
-
bug
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 60/100
-
Nmap
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
flang:fir-hlfir
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
llvm/llvm-project#225935 ·