[css-gcpm] "content-list" should rather be "<content-level>"

Open Beginner friendly
#2,919 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
1/5
Estimated time
Under an hour
Newbie friendliness
68/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
css
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Open the linked copy-into property definition and the content-list anchor in the CSS GCPM-4 draft. Check that the definition uses consistently on the left side and that the referenced name matches; done means the specification wording is corrected in both locations.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

css-gcpm-4

The copy-into property definition references <content-level> defined shortly after. However, the actual definition of content-level uses content-list instead of content-level.

Also, for consistency with other specs, the left-side of the equation should rather be enclosed in <>, i.e. <content-level>.

Dominant language
Bikeshed
Stars
4.9k
Forks
816
Avg merge
2d 18h
Merged PRs (30d)
24

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from w3c/csswg-drafts

All issues in w3c/csswg-drafts

Similar issues

More Documentation issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.