research: co-optimize FleetSim compression band and pool boundary
#2,555 opened on Jul 15, 2026
Repository metrics
- Stars
- (4,293 stars)
- PR merge metrics
- (PR metrics pending)
Description
Terminology correction
FleetSim's gamma in routing/compress_route.py is a compression-bandwidth ratio: it defines the borderline interval (B_short, gamma * B_short] in which a request may be compressed before choosing a short or long pool.
It is not the runtime gateway prompt-compression ratio. Runtime prompt compression is configured through fields such as max_tokens, min_length, profile, and weights. The unrelated SVM gamma configuration must also remain distinct.
Motivation
Research whether FleetSim can jointly tune its short/long pool threshold and the runtime prompt-compression policy, with a calibrated mapping between the two representations and safeguards against oscillation. C&R means compress-and-route.
Audited upstream baseline (2026-07-15)
- FleetSim has
CompressRoute, threshold optimization,B_short, and the compress-and-route (C&R)gammaband. - The semantic router has a separate prompt-compression implementation/configuration.
- Current
maindoes not define a measured mapping from runtime compression configuration to FleetSim's simulated compression success/quality/cost. - Runtime capacity/pool actuation remains downstream of semantic routing (#2513).
Research scope
- Define observable compression outcomes: before/after tokens, latency, failure/no-op, quality/safety evaluation, and policy version.
- Calibrate a FleetSim model from runtime profiles; do not equate
gammawith a runtime compression fraction. - Compare independent threshold tuning with joint tuning of:
- runtime compression profile/
max_tokens; - FleetSim
B_shortand C&Rgamma; - downstream pool capacity recommendation.
- runtime compression profile/
- Add quality/safety loss and uncertainty as hard constraints or explicit objectives.
- Add hysteresis, cooldown, minimum dwell, confidence thresholds, and rollback.
- Emit offline/advise-only recommendations first; router recipe changes and pool-control changes require separate owners/approval paths.
Boundaries
- Authorization, safety, output contract, and context limits override compression/capacity objectives.
- No optimization loop runs synchronously in ext_proc.
- No automatic pool mutation from the semantic model selector.
- Simulation parameters and runtime knobs must be versioned and translated explicitly.
Acceptance criteria
- A documented calibration maps runtime observations to FleetSim parameters with error bounds.
- Experiments compare no compression, fixed compression, independent tuning, and joint tuning.
- Quality/safety regressions fail the candidate.
- Hysteresis/rollback prevent oscillation under noisy demand.
- Router and pool recommendations are separately reviewable and auditable.
- Replay records requested compression, actual outcome, recommendation, and downstream action distinctly.
- Results report when joint tuning offers no material benefit.
Likely change surfaces
src/fleet-sim/fleet_sim/routing/compress_route.py, src/fleet-sim/fleet_sim/optimizer/threshold.py, semantic-router prompt-compression/config/ext_proc surfaces, Router Replay, dashboards, docs, and tests.
Related: #2018, #2359, #2513, #2550.
Validation entrypoint
make agent-report ENV=cpu CHANGED_FILES="<space-separated changed files>"
Follow the reported gates and affected E2E profiles.