Define a clear threat model for this project
#3287 opened on Apr 24, 2025
Description
Description
A threat model should be defined in order to have discussions about security features.
Who's implementing?
- I'm willing to implement this feature myself
The problem
It's been made clear that this project has no clearly defined threat model against which to weigh security options. This is explicitly preventing any discussions on potentially lacking security features from being taken seriously. Even the concept of just informing users of the current state of security seems off limits.
@PF4Public has said:
Any discussion that does not consider a clear and defined threat model is not serious to me
Therefore the lack of a clear and defined threat model should be remedied, and this model made public, in order to have serious discussions about security.
This issue blocks https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium/issues/2719 and may block any other security-related issues that have been brought up.
Possible solutions
I'd offer suggestions (and have) but it's been made clear that doing so is not welcome, so I believe this is something that the maintainers will need to discuss and define themselves.
Alternatives
Leave users in the dark about what security features are lacking and why, and continue to preemptively dismiss all security-related discussions because there is no threat model yet.
Additional context
I believe this "enhancement" is critical for a browser development team.